Vices · Porn

Porn

No shame. No sermon. A normal brain, dropped into a system built to hook it, and some genuinely useful ways to take the wheel back.

Your brain on the feed

Tap a glowing region. Then run the loop.

Prefrontal cortex Dorsal striatum Nucleus accumbens Amygdala + stress VTA · dopamine source

Real MRI, midline slice, recoloured. The striatum and amygdala sit a little off the midline, so they’re shown projected; positions approximate. Pathway dots are an illustration, not measured data. Image: “everyone’s idle”, CC BY-SA 2.0 (credits).

What the science actually says (and doesn’t)

Wanting vs liking. Dopamine in the VTA → nucleus accumbens pathway mostly drives wanting (craving, cue pull). Liking, the actual pleasure, runs on smaller, separate systems that don’t depend on dopamine. With repetition, wanting can grow while liking doesn’t. Berridge & Robinson 2016

Cue reactivity. 19 men with compulsive sexual behaviour vs 19 controls: explicit clips lit up the ventral striatum, dorsal anterior cingulate and amygdala more, and the men reported more desire but not more liking. Small study. Voon 2014

Novelty. 22 men with compulsive sexual behaviour vs 40 controls: they preferred novel sexual images more and showed stronger habituation (a fading response) to repeated ones. Banca 2016

“Porn shrinks your brain”? In 64 healthy men, more weekly hours went with less grey matter in the right caudate and weaker caudate–prefrontal connectivity. It’s correlational: the authors say it could be a consequence of use or a precondition for it. Kühn & Gallinat 2014

The debate. Some researchers argue the addiction model doesn’t fit. In one EEG study (N=122), problem users with higher desire showed smaller brain responses to sexual images, a pattern that doesn’t match addiction models. A critical review called the evidence for “porn addiction” weak and argued for treating the behaviour without the addiction label. Prause 2015 · Ley, Prause & Finn 2014

New research Cue learning. In an fMRI study of 58 men, problematic users kept a stronger “memory” for porn-linked cues during extinction and recall; the authors argue this fits a behavioural-addiction view. Kampa 2026 In 30 men with compulsive sexual behaviour vs controls, sex-related words drew stronger responses in the putamen, thalamus and hippocampus. Draps 2024 In 31 people from the general population, shapes paired with porn activated the nucleus accumbens more than shapes paired with money or games. Krikova 2024 All small samples.

New research …and evidence the other way. Three experiments found negative mood lowered porn craving, wanting didn’t rise with more explicit content, and withdrawal-type symptoms dropped during 10 days of abstinence, results the authors call conflicting for an addiction model. Sassover 2024 The classification debate is still open.

Habit circuits. In drug addiction research, a leading hypothesis is that control shifts from goal-directed (prefrontal, ventral striatum) to habit-driven (dorsal striatum) circuits. Whether this applies to porn isn’t established. Everitt & Robbins 2005

Stress. Stress is a well-established risk factor for addiction and relapse in substance research, which is why tired, anxious, late-night you is the most vulnerable you. Sinha 2008

Labels. DSM-5-TR has no porn addiction diagnosis. ICD-11 (WHO) lists compulsive sexual behaviour (code 6C72): persistent failure to control intense sexual urges, leading to marked distress or impairment. Distress that comes only from moral judgement isn’t enough on its own. WHO ICD-11 · Kraus 2018

The hopeful bit. Habits are learned through repetition in a context, and new habits form the same way. The brain that learned the loop is the same brain that learns the new one. Wood & Rünger 2016

Want ≠ likeDopamine drives wanting, not pleasure. You can crave more without enjoying it more.Berridge & Robinson 2016
New3.2%of 82,243 people in 42 countries screened at risk of problematic use on one scale. Only 4–10% of them had ever sought help.Bőthe 2024
12Average age US teens first saw porn. 45% felt it taught them “helpful” things about sex.Common Sense Media 2023
Not ruinedNo “porn addiction” in DSM-5-TR. Brain findings are early. Habits are learned, so they can be re-learned.ICD-11 · Wood & Rünger 2016

The system is rigged

You’re not weak. You grew up inside all of this at once. Tap a force.

None of this is an excuse. It’s context. Context is what you can actually change.

Private self-check

Nine honest questions. Three rings. One straight answer.

Runs only in your browser. Nothing is saved or sent. Close the tab and it’s gone.

Answer a few to see your rings fill.

Reflection questions written for this page. Not a validated test or a diagnosis. Validated screeners exist (for example the 5-item Brief Pornography Screen, Kraus 2020); a clinician can go through one with you.

Shame vs harm

Feeling “addicted” and having a problem aren’t always the same thing.

Is each thought about values clash (shame) or real-life cost (harm)? Tap to sort.

💜 Shame

    🔥 Harm

      Why this matters: moral incongruence

      In a US national sample (N=2,075), about 11% of men and 3% of women agreed “I am addicted to pornography.” Saying so was linked to more use, but also to being male, younger, more religious, and to moral incongruence: using porn while believing it’s wrong. Grubbs, Kraus & Perry 2019

      Earlier work found religiosity and moral disapproval predicted feeling addicted even after accounting for how much people used, while religiosity wasn’t related to how much users actually watched. Grubbs 2015 Researchers now describe “porn problems due to moral incongruence” as its own pathway. Grubbs 2019

      New research In 66,994 people across 34 countries, three genders and seven religious groups, moral incongruence strengthened the link between how often people watched and feeling addicted or out of control, everywhere it was tested. Bőthe 2026 A machine-learning study of 112,397 people placed moral incongruence and sexual shame among the five strongest predictors of problematic use, next to using porn to escape feelings or stress. Bőthe 2024b

      So: harm (lost sleep, missed work, a partner who feels hurt, use you can’t steer) calls for skills and support. Shame (“I’m disgusting”, “I’m broken”) calls for self-compassion and getting clear on your own values, whatever they are. Both are real. They need different tools. Shame on its own tends to drive the habit underground, not away.

      Your toolkit

      Map the triggers. Ride the wave. Build the plan.

      1 · Trigger mapper

      Tap everything that’s usually true right before. You’ll get swaps built for that moment.

      2 · Urge surf

      Urges rise, peak and fall, like a wave. You don’t have to act or fight. Just ride it.

      Ready when you arePick a length. 10 minutes is a great start.
      10:00
      Does this actually work?

      Urge surfing comes from mindfulness-based relapse prevention. In a study of 123 student smokers, a brief urge-surfing instruction didn’t change how strong urges felt, but the group smoked fewer cigarettes over the next 7 days. That’s the point: the urge still shows up, you just don’t have to obey it. Evidence for porn specifically is still thin. Bowen & Marlatt 2009

      Breathing here is slow (in 4, out 6). If it makes you dizzy, just breathe normally.

      3 · Build your plan

      Pick what fits. Your card builds live. Save it as an image or print it. We keep nothing.

      Porn vs real life

      Tap a card to flip it.

      Myths, weighed

      Common beliefs, and what’s actually true. Tap one to open it.

      An honest timeline

      1. Day 0 · Decide what you wantCut back, stop, or change how and when. A goal built on your values sticks better than one built on shame.
      2. Week 1 · Loud cuesUrges spike at the old times and places. A rough first week is usually habit and stress talking, not “detox.”
      3. Weeks 2–4 · PracticeCues still fire, but you’ve rehearsed what to do. Slips are common, and they’re data.
      4. Months 1–3 · New defaultsNew habits take a while to feel automatic, often a few months. Be patient with yourself.
      5. Day 90 · A checkpoint, not a finish lineThe “90-day reboot” is an internet idea, not a research finding. Look back at sleep, mood, focus and relationships, then decide what’s next.

      What actually helps

      Ranked by how strong the evidence is right now. Honest about the thin spots.

      The bar is the strength of evidence, not how much it might help you. Research on porn problems is young: even the top item rests on smallish, imperfect studies. Roza 2024 · López-Pinar 2025

      1. 1Therapy: CBT & ACTSkills for the loop, the urges, and what they’re doing for you.Best so far

        New research A 2025 meta-analysis pooled 20 studies (2,021 people), mostly CBT and ACT. People in therapy improved more than controls on problematic use and on how often and how long they watched, with large effects; effects on craving were small. Gains held at follow-up. The catch: many studies had a high risk of bias, so better trials are needed. López-Pinar 2025

        The best-known trial: 28 men, 12 sessions of ACT, viewing down 93% vs 21% on a waitlist. Crosby & Twohig 2016 A 2024 systematic review (28 studies, 500 people) rated the overall quality of evidence for every treatment as low or very low. Roza 2024

        CBT and relapse prevention map your triggers and rehearse responses; ACT works on making room for urges and steering by your values. Start now with the trigger mapper.

      2. 2Actually asking for helpMost people who struggle never get any help. That’s the gap.Clear need

        New research In a survey of 82,243 people across 42 countries, 3.2% screened at risk for problematic porn use. Only 4–10% of them had ever sought treatment; another 21–37% wanted to but didn’t, for reasons like cost. Bőthe 2024 Among people at high risk for compulsive sexual behaviour (4.8%), only 14% had ever sought treatment. Bőthe 2023

        In a placebo-controlled drug trial, men on placebo also improved a lot, and the authors point to disclosing the problem, motivation and outside support as possible reasons. Lew-Starowicz 2022 Telling someone is part of the work, not a sign it failed.

      3. 3Less shame, clearer valuesShame and “this is wrong” feelings are among the strongest predictors of feeling stuck.Strong link, few trials

        New research A machine-learning study combined 74 datasets (112,397 people, 16 countries). Of 700+ possible predictors of problematic use, the top five were: how often people watched, using porn to avoid feelings, using it to cope with stress, moral incongruence, and sexual shame. Bőthe 2024b

        New research Across 34 countries, three genders and seven religious groups (66,994 people), the same pattern held: the more someone morally disapproved, the more their use was tied to feeling addicted or out of control. Bőthe 2026

        Honest gap: no trial has tested “reduce shame” on its own as a treatment for porn problems. ACT and self-compassion work target it, which is why it ranks here. See shame vs harm.

      4. 4Structured self-help programmesOnline courses can help those who stick with them. Many don’t.Promising, big dropout

        In a randomised trial of a six-week online programme (264 people), those who finished reported much less problematic use, but 89% of the programme group dropped out before follow-up. Bőthe 2021 (Hands-off)

        New research A 2024 trial of a self-help “imaginal retraining” video (274 people) found a benefit among those who practised weekly, but not in the full intention-to-treat analysis. Retention was 52%. Baumeister 2024

      5. 5Mindfulness & urge surfingNotice the urge, ride it, don’t obey it.Early

        In a pilot of 13 men with compulsive sexual behaviour, eight weeks of mindfulness-based relapse prevention went with less time spent on problematic porn use and lower anxiety and depression. No control group. Holas 2020 The urge-surfing idea comes from smoking research. Bowen & Marlatt 2009

        Try it: urge surf.

      6. 6Real connectionLoneliness and problem use travel together.Emerging, mostly correlational

        New research In a nationally representative US sample (2,773 adults), problematic use went with more anxiety, depression and loneliness. Loneliness combined with frequent use was a specific risk. Cross-sectional, so cause is unclear. Engelhardt 2026

        New research In a study that followed 103 people over time, loneliness predicted later problematic use. Lin 2026 In a 42-country study, feeling connected to others (relatedness) was among the factors that separated higher-risk from low-risk users. Bőthe 2025

      7. 7Exercise with other people (and sleep)Good for you regardless. Direct evidence on porn is thin.One small study

        New research In a controlled study of 92 people, four weeks of group exercise didn’t significantly reduce loneliness or problematic use, but it stopped both from getting worse, while both rose in the control group. Lin 2026

        We found no trials testing sleep as a treatment for porn problems. It’s on this list as general support: tired, late-night you is the most exposed you.

      8. 8Friction & environmentPhone out of the bedroom, blockers, a new routine at the risky hour.Indirect

        Habit research shows habits are triggered by context, and changing the context is one of the most reliable ways to disrupt them. Wood & Rünger 2016 We found no trials testing blockers or filters for adults, so treat this as smart, not proven.

        Build yours: plan card.

      9. 9MedicationSome signals for naltrexone and SSRIs. Not a fix, and only with a prescriber.Limited, mixed

        A systematic review (13 studies, 141 people) titled “No Magic Pill” found naltrexone had the best, still limited, evidence, and said the benefit of paroxetine and citalopram over placebo was “suspect.” It recommends medication mainly within clinical trials. Borgogna 2024

        In a 73-man placebo-controlled trial, paroxetine and naltrexone did better than placebo in clinical interviews, but not on questionnaires or self-reported viewing, and the placebo group improved a lot too. Sedation was common. Lew-Starowicz 2022

        New research A 2026 open-label trial of 80 people found no significant difference between fluoxetine and naltrexone after 8 weeks. There was no placebo group. Savard 2026 Talk to a psychiatrist or doctor; don’t self-medicate.

      Getting help

      Not a last resort. More like a coach for your nervous system.

      Worth seeing a therapist if…

      You’ve tried to cut back and it keeps not sticking
      It’s costing sleep, work, money or a relationship
      You use it to numb out more than to enjoy it
      The shame is dragging your mood down

      What it actually looks like

      Look at it honestly, no judgement
      Map your loop and what feeds it
      Practise skills (CBT, ACT, DBT)

      In a small trial of 28 men, 12 sessions of ACT cut viewing by 93% vs 21% on a waitlist. Nearly all were from one religious community, so it’s promising, not proof. Crosby & Twohig 2016

      Slips are data, not verdicts. Which cue? What feeling? What would have helped? Then the next right step.

      I’m Baseer, an LCSW in Raleigh, NC. I work with adults 21+ (lots of young professionals and neurodivergent folks) using CBT, ACT and DBT. No lectures.

      Get in touchAbout me
      SAMHSA National Helpline · 1-800-662-4357Free, confidential, 24/7, English and Spanish. Treatment referrals and information. FindTreatment.govSearch licensed treatment near you by location, payment and type of care. 988 Suicide & Crisis LifelineCall or text 988 if you’re in crisis or thinking about suicide.
      Image credits
      • Brain MRI (brain-mri.webp): “MRI brain sagittal section” by everyone’s idle (originally posted to Flickr as “A brain - I has it”), via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 2.0 (license). Commons file page. Adapted for this page: cropped, masked and recoloured, with regions, pathways and labels drawn on top. This adaptation is shared under CC BY-SA 2.0.
      • surf-ocean.webp: “Ocean waves rippling” by Tim Marshall (Unsplash), via Wikimedia Commons, CC0 (public domain dedication). Commons file page · Unsplash original. Cropped and compressed.
      • flip-camera.webp: “Camera Battery” by Jakob Owens (Unsplash), via Wikimedia Commons, CC0 (public domain dedication). Commons file page · Unsplash original. Cropped and compressed.
      • flip-spotlight.webp: “Guitarist in the spotlight” by Linda Xu (Unsplash), via Wikimedia Commons, CC0 (public domain dedication). Commons file page · Unsplash original. Cropped and compressed.
      • flip-cinema.webp: “Disused Cinema” by Felix Mooneeram (Unsplash), via Wikimedia Commons, CC0 (public domain dedication). Commons file page · Unsplash original. Cropped and compressed.
      • flip-coffee.webp: “Coffee Talks” by Joshua Ness (Unsplash), via Wikimedia Commons, CC0 (public domain dedication). Commons file page · Unsplash original. Cropped and compressed.
      • flip-hands.webp: “Holding hands by wall” by freestocks.org (Unsplash), via Wikimedia Commons, CC0 (public domain dedication). Commons file page · Unsplash original. Cropped and compressed.
      • flip-pier.webp: “Land Extended Pier Night” by Ben White (Unsplash), via Wikimedia Commons, CC0 (public domain dedication). Commons file page · Unsplash original. Cropped and compressed.
      • helps-sunrise.webp: “Mountain sunrise” by Alice Donovan Rouse (Unsplash), via Wikimedia Commons, CC0 (public domain dedication). Commons file page · Unsplash original. Cropped and compressed.
      • Orbit icons (ic-*.webp, 16 files): original artwork generated for this page with Grok Bot image generation; no third-party source images.
      • Diagrams, gauges, waves and the plan card are drawn in code for this page.
      Sources (all opened and checked)
      1. WHO. ICD-11 for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics, code 6C72. icd.who.int/browse/2024-01/mms/en#1630268048
      2. Kraus SW, Krueger RB, Briken P, et al. Compulsive sexual behaviour disorder in the ICD-11. World Psychiatry. 2018;17:109-110. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29352554/
      3. Berridge KC, Robinson TE. Liking, wanting, and the incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Am Psychol. 2016;71:670-679. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27977239/
      4. Voon V, Mole TB, Banca P, et al. Neural correlates of sexual cue reactivity in individuals with and without compulsive sexual behaviours. PLoS One. 2014;9:e102419. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25013940/
      5. Banca P, Morris LS, Mitchell S, et al. Novelty, conditioning and attentional bias to sexual rewards. J Psychiatr Res. 2016;72:91-101. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26606725/
      6. Kühn S, Gallinat J. Brain structure and functional connectivity associated with pornography consumption: the brain on porn. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71:827-34. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24871202/
      7. Prause N, Steele VR, Staley C, et al. Modulation of late positive potentials by sexual images in problem users and controls inconsistent with “porn addiction”. Biol Psychol. 2015;109:192-9. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26095441/
      8. Ley D, Prause N, Finn P. The Emperor Has No Clothes: A Review of the ‘Pornography Addiction’ Model. Curr Sex Health Rep. 2014;6:94-105. doi.org/10.1007/s11930-014-0016-8
      9. Everitt BJ, Robbins TW. Neural systems of reinforcement for drug addiction: from actions to habits to compulsion. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:1481-9. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16251991/
      10. Sinha R. Chronic stress, drug use, and vulnerability to addiction. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1141:105-30. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18991954/
      11. Wood W, Rünger D. Psychology of Habit. Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:289-314. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26361052/
      12. Common Sense Media. Teens and Pornography (2022 survey of 1,358 US teens; press release Jan 10, 2023). www.commonsensemedia.org/press-releases/new-report-reveals-truths-about-how-teens-engage-with-pornography
      13. Vigers B. Younger Men in the U.S. Among the Loneliest in West. Gallup, May 20, 2025. news.gallup.com/poll/690788/younger-men-among-loneliest-west.aspx
      14. Office of the US Surgeon General. Our Epidemic of Loneliness and Isolation: Advisory on the Healing Effects of Social Connection and Community. 2023. www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/surgeon-general-social-connection-advisory.pdf
      15. Cox DA. The State of American Friendship: Change, Challenges, and Loss. Survey Center on American Life, June 8, 2021. www.americansurveycenter.org/research/the-state-of-american-friendship-change-challenges-and-loss/
      16. Pew Research Center. From Looking for Love to Swiping the Field: Online Dating in the U.S. Feb 2, 2023. www.pewresearch.org/internet/2023/02/02/from-looking-for-love-to-swiping-the-field-online-dating-in-the-u-s/
      17. Terlizzi EP, Zablotsky B. Mental health treatment among adults: United States, 2019. NCHS Data Brief No. 380. 2020. www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db380.htm
      18. Kraus SW, Gola M, Grubbs JB, et al. Validation of a Brief Pornography Screen across multiple samples. J Behav Addict. 2020;9:259-271. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32644937/
      19. Grubbs JB, Kraus SW, Perry SL. Self-reported addiction to pornography in a nationally representative sample: The roles of use habits, religiousness, and moral incongruence. J Behav Addict. 2019;8:88-93. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30632378/
      20. Grubbs JB, Exline JJ, Pargament KI, et al. Transgression as addiction: religiosity and moral disapproval as predictors of perceived addiction to pornography. Arch Sex Behav. 2015;44:125-36. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24519108/
      21. Grubbs JB, Perry SL, Wilt JA, Reid RC. Pornography Problems Due to Moral Incongruence: An Integrative Model with a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arch Sex Behav. 2019;48:397-415. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30076491/
      22. Bowen S, Marlatt A. Surfing the urge: brief mindfulness-based intervention for college student smokers. Psychol Addict Behav. 2009;23:666-71. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20025372/
      23. Veale D, Miles S, Bramley S, et al. Am I normal? A systematic review and construction of nomograms for flaccid and erect penis length and circumference in up to 15,521 men. BJU Int. 2015;115:978-86. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25487360/
      24. Herbenick D, Fu TJ, Arter J, et al. Women’s Experiences With Genital Touching, Sexual Pleasure, and Orgasm: Results From a U.S. Probability Sample of Women Ages 18 to 94. J Sex Marital Ther. 2018;44:201-212. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28678639/
      25. Landripet I, Štulhofer A. Is Pornography Use Associated with Sexual Difficulties and Dysfunctions among Younger Heterosexual Men? J Sex Med. 2015;12:1136-9. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25816904/
      26. Park BY, Wilson G, Berger J, et al. Is Internet Pornography Causing Sexual Dysfunctions? A Review with Clinical Reports. Behav Sci (Basel). 2016;6:17. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27527226/
      27. Kohut T, Fisher WA, Campbell L. Perceived Effects of Pornography on the Couple Relationship. Arch Sex Behav. 2017;46:585-602. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27393037/
      28. Fernandez DP, Kuss DJ, Justice LV, et al. Effects of a 7-Day Pornography Abstinence Period on Withdrawal-Related Symptoms in Regular Pornography Users: A Randomized Controlled Study. Arch Sex Behav. 2023;52:1819-1840. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36652136/
      29. Lally P, van Jaarsveld CHM, Potts HWW, Wardle J. How are habits formed: modelling habit formation in the real world. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2010;40:998-1009. doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.674
      30. Crosby JM, Twohig MP. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Problematic Internet Pornography Use: A Randomized Trial. Behav Ther. 2016;47:355-66. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27157029/
      31. SAMHSA National Helpline, 1-800-662-HELP (4357). www.samhsa.gov/find-help/helplines/national-helpline
      32. FindTreatment.gov (SAMHSA treatment locator). findtreatment.gov/
      33. 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline. 988lifeline.org/
      34. New López-Pinar C, Esparza-Reig J, Bőthe B. Psychotherapy for problematic pornography use: A comprehensive meta-analysis. J Behav Addict. 2025;14(2):630-643. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40126561/ · doi:10.1556/2006.2025.00018
      35. New Roza TH, Noronha LT, Shintani AO, et al. Treatment Approaches for Problematic Pornography Use: A Systematic Review. Arch Sex Behav. 2024;53(2):645-672. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37880509/ · doi:10.1007/s10508-023-02699-z
      36. New Bőthe B, Nagy L, Koós M, et al. Problematic pornography use across countries, genders, and sexual orientations: Insights from the International Sex Survey. Addiction. 2024;119(5):928-950. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38413365/ · doi:10.1111/add.16431
      37. New Bőthe B, Koós M, Nagy L, et al. Compulsive sexual behavior disorder in 42 countries: Insights from the International Sex Survey. J Behav Addict. 2023;12(2):393-407. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37352095/ · doi:10.1556/2006.2023.00028
      38. New Bőthe B, Vaillancourt-Morel MP, Bergeron S, et al. Uncovering the most robust predictors of problematic pornography use: A large-scale machine learning study across 16 countries. J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2024;133(6):489-502. (cited as Bőthe 2024b) pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38884980/ · doi:10.1037/abn0000913
      39. New Bőthe B, Michaud A, Beaulieu V, et al. A global investigation of the Moral Incongruence Model of Pornography Use across genders, religions, and cultures. J Behav Addict. 2026;15(2):636-649. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42013354/ · doi:10.1556/2006.2025.00540
      40. New Bőthe B, Tóth-Király I, Popova N, et al. Identification and comprehensive characterization of moral disapproval and behavioral dysregulation-based pornography-use profiles across 42 countries. J Behav Addict. 2025;14(1):131-154. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39945767/ · doi:10.1556/2006.2024.00054
      41. New Bőthe B, Baumgartner C, Schaub MP, et al. Hands-off: Feasibility and preliminary results of a two-armed randomized controlled trial of a web-based self-help tool to reduce problematic pornography use. J Behav Addict. 2021;10(4):1015-1035. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34727088/ · doi:10.1556/2006.2021.00070
      42. New Baumeister A, Gehlenborg J, Schuurmans L, et al. Reducing problematic pornography use with imaginal retraining: A randomized controlled trial. J Behav Addict. 2024;13(2):622-634. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38669086/ · doi:10.1556/2006.2024.00018
      43. New Holas P, Draps M, Kowalewska E, et al. A pilot study of mindfulness-based relapse prevention for compulsive sexual behaviour disorder. J Behav Addict. 2020;9(4):1088-1092. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33216012/ · doi:10.1556/2006.2020.00075
      44. New Engelhardt R, et al. Problematic Pornography Use and Psychological Distress in the USA: A Nationally Representative Study. Arch Sex Behav. 2026. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41559436/ · doi:10.1007/s10508-025-03266-4
      45. New Lin Y, et al. Breaking the cycle between loneliness and problematic pornography use: A group-based physical exercise intervention. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2026. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41575062/ · doi:10.1111/aphw.70119
      46. New Borgogna NC, Owen T, Johnson D, Kraus SW. No Magic Pill: A Systematic Review of the Pharmacological Treatments for Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder. J Sex Res. 2024;61(9):1328-1341. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38047874/ · doi:10.1080/00224499.2023.2282619
      47. New Lew-Starowicz M, Draps M, Kowalewska E, et al. Tolerability and efficacy of paroxetine and naltrexone for treatment of compulsive sexual behaviour disorder. World Psychiatry. 2022;21(3):468-469. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36073700/ · doi:10.1002/wps.21026
      48. New Savard J, Piwowar M, Adebahr R, et al. Randomised controlled trial of fluoxetine versus naltrexone in compulsive sexual behaviour disorder. BMJ Ment Health. 2026;29(1):e302953. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42838712/ · doi:10.1136/bmjment-2026-302953
      49. New Kampa M, et al. Persistent appetitive memory in problematic pornography users. J Behav Addict. 2026. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41805604/ · doi:10.1556/2006.2025.00452
      50. New Draps M, et al. Emotional interference and attentional bias in compulsive sexual behaviors disorder: An fMRI study on heterosexual males. J Behav Addict. 2024. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38967992/ · doi:10.1556/2006.2024.00033
      51. New Krikova K, et al. Appetitive conditioning with pornographic stimuli elicits stronger activation in reward regions than monetary and gaming-related stimuli. Hum Brain Mapp. 2024. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38798103/ · doi:10.1002/hbm.26711
      52. New Sassover E, et al. Investigating mood-modification, withdrawal, and sensitization in compulsive sexual behaviour. Front Psychiatry. 2024. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39465047/ · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1421028
      53. New Lewczuk K, et al. Withdrawal and tolerance as related to compulsive sexual behavior disorder and problematic pornography use: Preregistered study based on a nationally representative sample in Poland. J Behav Addict. 2022. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36269607/ · doi:10.1556/2006.2022.00076
      54. New Pathmendra P, et al. Exposure to Pornography and Adolescent Sexual Behavior: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2023. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36853749/ · doi:10.2196/43116
      55. New Chew PKH, Yow YJ, Tan CSY. Prevalence of problematic pornography use: a meta-analysis. Sex Health. 2025;22:SH25054. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40977234/ · doi:10.1071/SH25054

      Related on this site

      AnxietyDepressionInsomniaStress & burnoutSexual healthADHDBodyEverything
      ← VicesGalaxy